An investigation by Shelter has found evidence of a minority of unscrupulous buy-to-let landlords having an adverse effect on their tenants.
184 environmental health officers (EHOs) were polled by the charity, with over 90% of those who dealt with private renters directly stating that they had encountered landlords harassing or illegally evicting their tenants. In addition, more than 90% said that they had encountered cases of severe damp, mould, or electrical or fire hazards in properties they had looked into in the last year.
Almost all respondents stated that they had come across landlords who persistently ignored their responsibilities, while half of the EHOs expressed a belief that the main reason for letting out unsafe properties was to make as much money as possible. More than six in ten of respondents said that more than half their cases involved people from vulnerable groups.
One officer cited the case of a property that had been rented out with no heating, hot water or electricity. Another found a mother and child living with no kitchen facilities and no fire precautions, with the house being warmed only by a halogen heater.
Shelter’s chief executive Campbell Robb, said: “It is simply not acceptable that people are handing over their hard earned cash to live in houses that are run-down, squalid and in some cases even dangerous.”
He said that far from there being “just the odd crook here and there,” the investigation revealed that there were actually such “ruthless” rogue landlords operating across the UK. He added that there was therefore an urgent need to tackle the problem on a national level.
Robb called on the Government to work with authorities to develop a hard-hitting programme of action that would root out rogue landlords. He said that it was important to prosecute and strike off the minority of landlords who did break the rules in order to prevent the exploitation of other private renters in the future.
National Landlords Association (NLA) Chairman David Salusbury also urged further action by councils, commenting: “We roundly condemn the worst excesses in the private-rented sector where a small minority of landlords choose to exploit their tenants by offering sub-standard property which can endanger lives. This is unacceptable and local authorities must act.”
He said that although “most private landlords are responsible and honest in how they deal with their tenants and look after the properties,” severe penalties had to be expected by landlords who wilfully ignored the rules and regulations designed to protect tenants.
He urged councils to adopt a ‘zero tolerance’ attitude to such landlords, adding that “if this rogue element within the sector goes unchallenged, then reputable landlords are tarnished and the image of the private-rented sector is damaged.”
Landlords on the lookout for loss of rent cover in the event of their premises becoming uninhabitable due to damage caused by an insured peril may want to take a look at comprehensive and good value landlord insurance.

